Impact Of NARCO Analysis On Accuracy And Reliability Evidence Obtained In Criminal Investigation In India

Abstract

The practice of narcoanalysis, a controversial investigative technique involving the administration of drugs to elicit information from suspects, has been a subject of debate and scrutiny in India's criminal justice system. This abstract explores the impact of narcoanalysis on the accuracy and reliability of evidence obtained during criminal investigations in India. Narcoanalysis has gained popularity as a tool to extract vital information from reluctant or uncooperative suspects, thereby aiding law enforcement agencies in solving complex criminal cases. However, its usage has been met with significant ethical and legal concerns, as it raises questions about individual rights, the potential for coercion, and the reliability of information extracted under the influence of drugs. This research delves into the legal framework surrounding the admissibility of narcoanalysis-derived evidence in Indian courts and its compatibility with the fundamental principles of criminal jurisprudence. It analyses key landmark cases where narcoanalysis was employed and examines the resultant impact on trial outcomes and justice delivery. Furthermore, the study investigates the scientific validity and credibility of information obtained through narcoanalysis, considering the effects of drugs on memory recall and the possibility of false confessions or fabricated statements. Psychological factors influencing the reliability of narcoanalysis-derived evidence are also explored. To gain a comprehensive understanding, the research incorporates comparative analyses with other investigative techniques, such as traditional interrogation methods, polygraph tests, and modern forensic advancements, to assess the relative effectiveness of narcoanalysis in enhancing the accuracy of evidence. While it may provide crucial breakthroughs in certain cases, its potential for violating individual rights and producing unreliable information requires stringent safeguards, including strict adherence to ethical guidelines, informed consent procedures, and judicial oversight. Ultimately, this abstract highlights the ongoing debate surrounding narcoanalysis in the Indian criminal justice system and advocates for further research and discussion to establish its appropriate role in balancing the pursuit of truth with the protection of individual liberties and ensuring the reliability of evidence in criminal investigations.